
Inescapable entrapments? : the civil-military decision paths to Uruzgan and Helmand
Military involvement in foreign policy decision-making, and its role as a driving force in that process, has long been anathema to both academic and practitioner circles. Without wanting to pursue the quest for principles or ultimate predictions this study looks specifically into the role of the military in foreign policy decision-making. It does so by carefully reconstructing and comparing the sequential series of decisions of a group of British and Dutch senior civil and military decision-makers which have led to the deployment of their militaries into to Afghan provinces of Helmand and Uruzgan. One of the most prominent findings of this analysis is the shaping ability of military initiatives on the series of decisions and the consequent path dependent reasoning during political deliberations on the deployment of military forces: the decision of the United Kingdom and the Netherlands to deploy their troops to southern Afghanistan was based on an emergent case that largely built itself. Includes bibliographical references and index. 294 pages ; 24 cm
- Grandia Mantas, Mirjam,
- NIOD Bibliotheek
- Text
- on1243352006
- Civil-military relations--Netherlands.
- Civil-military relations--Great Britain.
- Afghanistan--Foreign relations--Great Britain.
- Afghanistan--Foreign relations--Netherlands.
- Netherlands--Foreign relations--Afghanistan.
- Great Britain--Foreign relations--Afghanistan.
- Military assistance, British--Afghanistan.
Bij bronnen vindt u soms teksten met termen die we tegenwoordig niet meer zouden gebruiken, omdat ze als kwetsend of uitsluitend worden ervaren.Lees meer